People visit the exhibition booth of BYD at an auto show in Xi'an, Northwest China's Shaanxi province, May 1, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]
The US and China have been recently trading barbs over Chinese electric vehicles (EVs). The US accuses Chinese EVs of overcapacity, claiming they disrupt both the US and global markets and pose risks, including information security concerns. The US has unilaterally imposed a 100 per cent tariff rate on Chinese EVs. China, on the other hand, asserts that its EV industry represents advanced capacity that helps combat climate change and promote global green transition, and accuses Washington of undermining fair and free trade and competition.
The fierce debate between the two major countries mirrors past disputes. Similar to today's EV dispute, there was an incident regarding gasoline-powered vehicles in the early 20th century.
When gasoline-powered automobiles first hit the market, they were costly and produced in limited numbers, making them a luxury exclusive to the wealthy. Ford Motor Company transformed the industry by introducing standardization and assembly line production, which significantly reduced manufacturing costs and boosted production. This innovation led to a substantial decrease in prices, making cars affordable and accessible to the masses. Despite strong opposition from luxury car brands and their interest groups, the Ford Model T, known for its quality and affordability, quickly gained widespread popularity globally. Ford's pioneering production techniques helped the company overcome various challenges, spurred technological advancement and increased revenue across the automotive supply chain. It also revolutionized people's modes of transportation and transformed the automotive industry and related sectors.
Throughout history, similar debates have arisen over emerging capacities, with Ford's automotive revolution being perhaps the best known one. In essence, these debates represent the clash between progress and conservatism, between the advanced and the outdated. In many ways, the history of human civilization is a history of the adoption of advanced capacity.
The popularization and transfer of advanced capacity have often led to clashes with outdated capacity and its interest groups. But not all stories have a happy ending as Ford did.
In the 1980s, Japan's semiconductor industry rapidly expanded its global market share with world-leading manufacturing and design capabilities, posing a significant threat to American semiconductor producers who used to dominate the market. Obsessed with their dominant position, these American companies lobbied the US government to label Japan as setting "structural barriers", and to impose high punitive tariffs on Japanese semiconductors. By inflating the prices of Japanese products, the US firms reclaimed their market share through non-market approaches. Unfortunately, Japan failed to defend its own interests or seek resolution through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), nor did global buyers unite to support Japan's semiconductor producers. As a result, the advance of the semiconductor industry was stunted, and international trade was used more and more as a weapon, warping the global industrial and supply chains.
Stories of Ford and Japan's semiconductor industry show that current suppression on Chinese EVs is essentially a confrontation between advanced capacity and entrenched interests.
Ford's success proves that advanced capacity is bound to outcompete the outdated forces and gain wider support since it drives industrial advancement and benefits the people. By contrast, the decline of Japan's semiconductor industry tells us that advanced capabilities are likely to be crippled under the pretext of "overcapacity" if no action is taken. Outdated capacity does not phase out naturally. Progress can prevail only through concerted efforts.
Chinese EVs, representing green energy and smart technologies, will help tackle climate change and bring a better life to the people. To better meet demands of people from all countries, more and cheaper Chinese EVs are needed. This also requires us to extend stronger support to Chinese EVs in a more open way. Such support is not for China only, but for every one of us and for human advancement as a whole.
中新经纬2月18日电 “长三角铁路”微博18日消息，截至2月17日，2024年春节假期正式落下帷幕，长三角铁路假期8天发送旅客逾1700万人次，日均发送旅客在215万人次以上，较2019年同期增幅超六成。2月18日(正月初九)是假期后的 龙年春节档的卖相与怪相 龙年春节档迎来尾声。回望春节前夕，无超级大片，多数影片都是熟面孔且不举行首映，观众进影院如开盲盒。以“贾玲减重100斤”为首的各种营销策略铺天盖地袭来，一度让部分观众产生逆反心理，对 作者：秦天宝（武汉大学环境法研究所所长）2023年11月，中央全面深化改革委员会第三次会议审议通过了《关于全面推进美丽中国建设的意见》《关于加强生态环境分区管控的指导意见》等重要文件。习近平 新华社记者戴小河与年前寒潮相比，龙年的第一轮寒潮降温幅度更大、低温持续时间更长、冻雨影响范围更广、南方降雨更强。多地气温“俯冲式”下跌，供暖供电需求攀升。煤、电、气等能源行业积极应对，全天候 贵州毕节：蓄势赋能谋发展 高质量推进新型工业化 中新网贵州毕节2月22日电 题：贵州毕节：蓄势赋能谋发展 高质量推进新型工业化 作者 高大涛 陈曦 中国龙年春节假期，贵州省毕节市黔西市新仁乡化屋村游人如织。 多家钛白粉企业再度宣布涨价 2月22日，钛白粉企业金浦钛业发布公告宣布涨价，金浦钛业表示，自2月22日起，公司锐钛型钛白粉销售价格上调800元/吨，对国际各类客户上调110美元/吨；金红石型钛白粉销售价格上调600元/吨，对国 。本文链接：Chinese electric vehicles: Overcapacity or advanced capacity?http://www.sushuapos.com/show-5-25258-0.html
声明：本网站为非营利性网站，本网页内容由互联网博主自发贡献，不代表本站观点，本站不承担任何法律责任。天上不会到馅饼，请大家谨防诈骗！若有侵权等问题请及时与本网联系，我们将在第一时间删除处理。
上一篇： GLOBALink | China Explorers: British couple falls in love with Chinese bubble tea
下一篇： 多部国家级非遗舞剧在新疆喀什上演